Skip to content
The Employee Relations Division plans and conducts labor negotiations, implements labor agreements, and assists managers and supervisors with employee issues, including corrective action.
Employee & Labor Relations
Employee & Labor Relations
Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Resources
    • MOUs
      • AFSCME MOU
      • BCTC MOU
      • CNA MOU
      • DSA-Sworn Safety MOU
      • Extra Help MOU
      • LEU (DSA Non-Safety) MOU
      • OSS MOU
      • SEIU MOU
      • SMCCE MOU
      • UAPD MOU
      • Probation & Detention Association (PDA)
    • Resolutions
      • Confidential Resolution
      • Management Resolution
      • Unrepresented Attorney Resolution
    • Employee Relations Handbook
      • 1. Introduction to the Employee Relations Handbook
      • 2. Documentation
      • 3. Probationary Periods
      • 4. Introduction to Performance & Conduct
      • 5. The Skelly Process
      • 6. Performance
      • 7. Conduct
      • 8. Conducting Employee Investigations
      • 9. Tardiness & Absenteeism
      • 10. Employee Assistance Program
      • 11. Overview – Grievances & Appeals
      • 12. The Grievance Process
      • 13. The Civil Service Appeal Process
      • 14. Classified & Unclassified Employment
      • 15. Seniority & Layoffs
      • 16. Work Schedules
      • 17. Leaves of Absence
      • 18. Labor Relations
      • 19. Reference Checks
    • Limited Term Employee Handbook
    • County Policy
      • COVID-19 Policy
      • Admin Memos
      • Civil Service Rules
      • County Ordinance Code
      • Master Salary Ordinance
    • Procedures
      • COVID-19 Procedure
    • Training
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Overview of Traditional Discipline Program

In 7. Conduct
Tagged Conduct, Employee Relations Handbook

The County practices the concept of progressive discipline. When an employee’s conduct warrants corrective action, the supervisor/manager takes the lowest level of disciplinary action which: 1) is appropriate to the severity of the employee’s offense; and 2) is likely to result in the employee not repeating the misconduct.

Under a traditional discipline program, minor misconduct (e.g., initial instances of tardiness or absenteeism) is normally dealt with through counseling confirmed in writing. Should the misconduct be repeated, the normal progression is a letter of reprimand followed by a suspension. Further misconduct may result in a second suspension, demotion, or dismissal. Misconduct of a more serious nature may result in suspension, demotion, or dismissal on the first offense.

The Non-Punitive Discipline Program follows the same steps as a traditional program with one exception – unpaid suspensions are replaced by disciplinary letters that equate to a suspension of a specified number of days. Non-Punitive Discipline is not a lower level of discipline than a suspension, and does not include the option to suspend rather than issuing a non-punitive disciplinary letter. This provision was put into place to avoid disparate treatment (i.e. suspending one employee and issuing another employee who committed the same offense a non-punitive disciplinary letter).

The non-punitive disciplinary letter carries the same weight as a corresponding suspension. An arbitrator hearing a grievance on a subsequent offense for an employee who had previously been issued a disciplinary letter equating to a 3-day suspension must consider the employee to have been suspended for 3 days. Since non-punitive discipline carries the same weight and equates to an unpaid suspension, the burden of proof to show cause is also the same. In other words, the manager/department must be prepared to produce the same level of proof before the Civil Service Commission or an arbitrator as if the employee had been suspended.

2015-04-01
Previous Post: Non-Punitive Discipline Program Description
Next Post: Objectives of the Non-Punitive Discipline Program


Get it on Google Play


Get it on Google Play

Designed using Chromatic. Powered by WordPress.

Employee & Labor Relations